The move for greater autonomy in decision-making powers in
the Scottish Isles is a positive development, and highly relevant given
Scotland’s wider bid for independent status. As has been stated before, the decision of
centralising Scottish government in the Scottish capital as opposed to London is a logical choice
given that the country has both a different political and cultural composition
than the rest of the UK, and as such should be able to make a majority of the
decisions that affect it on its own territory, given the differing needs and
wishes of the Scottish populace.
In-keeping with this, the Scottish Islands have different
economic and social needs to other parts of Scotland, and as such, it is
logical that they should want a greater say in affairs of relevance to them,
rather than having too much central planning that is decided at a distance and
could well be, in truth, entirely irrelevant to their livelihoods. As a for
instance, at least two of the Scottish Isles constituencies are of a generally liberal
persuasion, where-as a large swathe of the rest of Scotland is comprised of SNP
regional members. Therefore, the push for increased autonomy in decision-making
should come as no surprise.
It is not only ideological factors that should come into
play when deciding what level of autonomy to offer, however. The way of life in
the Scottish Isles (and islands in general) is in many ways very different from
that on the mainland, and it is important to give economic, social and cultural
policies greater consideration when deciding what to implement. This can
perhaps be done best by inviting local people to play a greater part in decision
making, and allowing them a greater say in local affairs.
No comments:
Post a Comment